There is a
further form of thermal ratchet that might be of significance greater than that
for which it is currently credited. In reopening consideration of Moseley’s
gravity ratchet as a possible contributory cause of some glacial ice motions
(Croll. 2005d) it has been suggested that a thermal ratchet like that described
above for pingos and ice polygons, etc, based upon the differential properties
of ice failures in tension and compression, may also be a significant factor in
the motion of certain forms of glacier (Croll 2004c). In being able to account
for motions of glacial ice on essentially flat surfaces, and even those with
negative gradient, this material ratchet would seem worthy of consideration.
The forces developed are consistent with both the observed motions and the immense
erosive power of glacial ice in motion. It is possible that a related mechanism
could be powering the movements of certain rock glaciers and contributing to
such features as sheets, benches, lobes and streams.
Mention
should also be made of frost-creep in the context of ratchetting processes. In
this case the ratchet mechanism within currently accepted models is somewhat
different, and thought to involve a combination of frost-heave occurring normal
to the slope, followed by a thaw that results a stone or other object settling
vertically under the action of gravity. The result is a gradual downward motion
accompanying each freeze-thaw cycle. It is possible that the thermal ratchet
similar to that possibly occurring in the movement of glacial ice could also be
contributing to the phenomenon of frost-creep. For the temperature fluctuations
taking place above freezing it is again possible that some of the down-slope
motion classified as frost-creep could also be the result of the
Moseley-Davison insolation-creep process. Space does not permit consideration
of the extent to which those phenomena explained in terms of solifluction and
gelifluction might also have contributions from the thermo-mechanical ratchet
processes outlined above. But in all of these surface motions it is possible to
construct models that could be complementing the processes currently considered
to provide the driving force.
Some
Closing Remarks
One of the purposes of the past few posts has been to suggest
that thermo-mechanical ratchet processes, derived from fluctuations in the
levels of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface, may be contributing to
rather more periglacial processes than is currently accepted. These ratchets
could be classified in terms of the thermo-mechanical process responsible, so
that for example in:
·
up-freezing it is thought to be the combination
of frost heave followed by soil failure in the form of slumping, together with
the differential bond in frozen and unfrozen ground;
·
the development of ice-wedges and ice-wedge
polygons, side-shift to form stone circles, polygons, etc, possibly the outward
movements of ice-sheets, and even rock glaciers, it would appear to be the
differences in tensile and compressive material failures of the frost layer or
the permafrost that give rise to the one-way ratchet actions. This process
could also be a factor in the movement of glacial ice;
·
the growth of pingos, palsas, frost-mounds and
possibly hummocks, it could be the differences in tension material failures and
the compressive geometric, buckling, structural failures that provide the
driving force;
·
the down-slope motion referred to as insolation
creep, and possible also as a contribution to what is referred to as frost
creep and gelifluction, it might also be the effects of gravity acting
differently during the warming, expansion, phase than during cooling,
contraction, phase that provides the basis for the ratchet action. This process
might also contribute to the movement of glacial ice.
In each of these processes it is fluctuations in
temperature caused by changes in levels of solar radiation reaching the ground
surface that provides the energy source. A further sub-classification might be
possible in terms of the time period over which these temperature fluctuations
occur. Some will be driven by circadian or in the case of Moseley’s crawling
theory by even shorter time-scales. Others may be influenced by weather changes
occurring over days or weeks, and others by the annual seasonal cycle. Yet
others may depend upon changes that occur over many years while some may have
their dynamic processes taking place over hundreds, thousands, inter-glacial or
even longer time periodicity. At each increase or decrease in order of
magnitude of the periodicity of the thermal cycle it is likely that the spatial
scale of the processes will also be changed by similar orders of magnitude. The
spatial scales will be related to the lengths over which thermal waves will be
conducted into the ice or the Earth’s crust. As is becoming clear from evidence
from recent planetary probes, many of the surface features being observed on
the other planets and their satellites (see for example Kuzmin 2002; Yoshikawa
2002) would appear to have close relationships with similar features on Earth.
Improved understanding of the mechanics responsible for developing these
features will be essential if these observations are to allow better
understanding the origins of the solar system, including a more complete
appreciation of the nature and influences of present and past climatic
conditions.
It is also
becoming clear that closely related morphological features exist at very small
scale in the behaviour of asphalt (Croll 2005a,c, 2006a,b). In these analogous
cases similar forms of thermo-mechanical ratchet processes would appear to be
responsible. Again, better understanding of the mechanics will be essential if
future design and maintenance strategies for asphalt pavements are to allow
reductions from their currently very high costs. To capture all these effects
it is clear that account must be taken of the relationships linking the thermal
periodicities and the spatial scales. With a key factor in this inter-linkage
being related to the depth of propagation of the thermal wave, it seems clear
that one-dimensional, surface only, models like those employed (Plug and Werner
2001, 2002) will be unlikely to capture this crucial spatial-temporal link. It
also seems clear that fluctuations in levels of solar energy and the operation
of various forms of thermo-mechanical ratchet process are rather more common in
the shaping of periglacial environments than is currently recognised. This
paper represents a small start towards suggesting a new classification of many
periglacial features based upon the form of the thermo-mechanical ratchet
processes that might be at work in their formation.
No comments:
Post a Comment